US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, & Pensions

Senate, House Leaders Introduce Bill to Provide Certainty to Employers Offering Innovative Employee Wellness Programs

Legislation will eliminate confusion caused by EEOC for employers who provide financial rewards to employees for healthy lifestyle choices

Tuesday, March 03, 2015Margaret Atkinson / Jim Jeffries (Alexander) 202-224-2465


WASHINGTON, D.C., March 3 – U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.) with Sens. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), and Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) yesterday introduced legislation to provide legal certainty—and eliminate confusion caused by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)—for employers offering employee wellness programs that lower health insurance premiums to reward healthy lifestyle choices.

gMore and more, employers are using outcomes-based programs to make health insurance less expensive for their employees,h said Alexander, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. gNearly half of all large employers say they plan to offer one these innovative plans in 2015, making it even more important to eliminate confusion caused by the EEOC and restore certainty for employers who want to reward their employees for leading a healthy lifestyle.h

gEmployee wellness programs not only help control the cost of health insurance,h said Kline, chairman of the House Education and the Workforce Committee, gbut they also promote healthy lifestyles. Remarkably, executive overreach by the EEOC is actually punishing employers for offering wellness plans. Congress must take action to rein in this agency and provide the certainty necessary for more Americans to enjoy the benefits of these innovative health programs.h

gWith so many employers taking advantage of the benefits that come with offering workplace wellness programs, it is important that Congress acts to clear any legal uncertainty or confusion,h said Enzi, chairman on the Senate Subcommittee on Primary Health and Retirement Security. gBy reaffirming existing law, Congress is ensuring that employees can continue to benefit financially when they choose to make healthy lifestyle choices.h

gThis legislation ensures what Congress has already decided – private companies are free to promote health and wellness among their employees through voluntary incentives like premium discounts, rather than heavy-handed federal mandates and taxes. I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of the Preserving Employee Wellness Program Act, and applaud employers that put in place such programs to lower health care costs for employees while also creating a healthy workforce,h said Isakson, chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety.

gOur health care system needs common sense solutions driven by positive outcomes, not more uncertainty caused by the federal government,h said Scott. gEmployee wellness plans have been proven to help control health insurance costs, and as more and more employers utilize them it is essential that the EEOC simply clarify its rules instead of pursuing litigation against employers because it has refused to issue guidance. I am excited to join my colleagues to introduce this important legislation that helps promote healthy lifestyles and cuts through some of the bureaucratic maze that Washington specializes in creating."

gWith this bill, Congressfs bipartisan commitment to employee wellness programs should put a stop to EEOCfs overreach in seeking a court order to halt a companyfs healthcare premium discount program,h said Hatch. gAt a time when Obamacare is creating uncertainty for employers and employees, this act will provide legal certainty to employers offering workplace wellness programs."

gOnce again during the Obama Administration, Congress must clarify the intent of a bipartisan provision,h Roberts said. gIn this case, I am happy to co-sponsor legislation that would reaffirm our commitment to business and health in regards to wellness programs. Financial incentives get results. Employers should be able to offer programs that encourage employees to make healthy lifestyle choices.h

gThis is yet another example of the EEOC being out of step with employers and employees,h Walberg said. gInnovative approaches that empower employees to take more control of their personal health care decisions should be encouraged, not stymied by greater government overreach,h said Walberg, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.

A bipartisan provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act allowed employers to discount health insurance premiums by up to 30 percent—or 50 percent if approved by the Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services—for healthy lifestyle choices like quitting smoking or maintaining a healthy cholesterol level. A recent survey by Towers Watson and the National Business Group on Health showed that 46 percent of large employers plan to offer one of these programs in 2015. However, recent litigation pursued by the EEOC, citing the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, has threatened the certainty of law for employers who offer these programs.

The Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act, introduced today by Alexander and Kline, will reaffirm existing law, which allows for employee wellness programs tied to a financial reward. The legislation clarifies that an employeefs spouse may participate in the program as well. It also provides employees up to 180 days to request and complete an alternative wellness program if it is medically inadvisable or unreasonably difficult for an employee to participate in the original employee wellness program. Finally, the legislation does not limit the EEOCfs authority to investigate and litigate complaints of employment discrimination.

###